A rational examination of the 9/11 conspiracy

The Japanese Parliament formally began calling for an investigation into the 9/11 terrorist attacks, questioning the dubious findings of the official U.S. report, citing numerous inconsistencies that point towards an active U.S. role in the attacks. Knowing full well how absurd such a notion is to someone who hasn't fully realized the evidence and inconsistencies, consider the following facts before drawing conclusions:

To begin with, one would have to consider the questioning of the official United States report on the 9/11 attacks by an allied power like the Japanese to be major news. You're talking about a major foreign power implying that 9/11 was of our own creation. Such a story should be front page news, yet Google this topic in Google News or search in Yahoo News and you will find not even one single AP report covering this. Search the web though and you will find blog after blog reporting on this event. This happened on the 10th of January and by now should definitely have been picked up by the American media. After all, the bloggers have. It's not that the American media doesn't know about it, they just choose not to cover. This is evidence of an active conspiracy. It's just too perfect that not one major United States media outlet has picked up on this story. It's simple, they don't want it known. Below is a link to the actual Japanese parliamentary session, translated into English of course. This is major news.

http://www.chycho.com/?q=node/1551#comment_form

Now to some solid evidence and inconsistencies from the 9/11 conspiracy that need to be investigated by an outside, non-government agency.

1. There was no plane found at the Pentagon where flight 77 supposedly impacted. The official report claims the intense heat disintegrated the plane and the debris, but credible scientists have come forward and determined that the maximum output of heat generated by that plane with the amount of fuel known to have been on board would not have been enough to do what the report claims.

Furthermore, of the debris found at the site, some of the wreckage was not consistent with a Boeing 757. In the link below, head half to three quarters of the way down the page and notice the comparison between the engine of a 757 and the engine found at the crash site. You will notice that the engine of a 757 has a turban with a grooved center plate. The turbine found at the crash site has a smooth center plate, with a completely different pattern at the end.

http://judicial-inc.biz/pentagon_flight.htm

The engine found at the site has since been positively identified as that of a 737. That's a huge problem. We know that flight 77 was a 757, and that some identification of the passengers from that flight were found at crash site (being paper and plastic id's it's difficult to imagine these things surviving the crash seeing as little of the metal from the plane survived?) So how is this explained? It hasn't been, the report didn't address it. And if that weren't enough, roughly 80 surveillance cameras keep watch over the Pentagon, but only one video has been released. Little can be discerned from the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZpXvCqjemI

There are many more inconsistencies. Yukihisa Fujita of the Democratic Party of Japan during the aforementioned parliamentary sessions questions the unexplainable collapse of WTC building 7, which wasn't hit during the attacks. This too was left out of the official 9/11 commissioned report. Steel buildings don't succumb to fire, not the structure and foundation.

The conspiracy theorists believe that this was an inside government job, so it would stand to reason that a government led investigation wouldn't hold much weight. If the government were telling the truth, why all the secrecy and concealment of footage? The evidence doesn't add up. None of this means anything right now other than the official conclusions our government has drawn do not add up. This is why an official investigation from an outside source needs to be commissioned.